10 video sharing site evaluation
10 video sharing site evaluation recently, video-sharing sites such as emerging as the tide, which seems to lead YouTube (a few have already raised $ 10 million.) We want a clear copy of the c Flickr successful experience of the first to do video of the Google Web site. Hey, even Google launched Google itself? Video. One can imagine the result, competition is naturally very intense. Therefore, although the majority of the sites Google, their stay in the Beta state, but in order to bite on this big cake on one, and some have already started issuing such as online video editing and hash functions. Let the ordinary user, these did not seem important. To a video-to let everyone see, Lealea with Kazakhstan on the trip. The key lies in better use depends on which Web site. Had, not that nonsense, and that is entered.
This test used is a 15 MB of Quicktime documents, as to why no rmvb, mpg, avi, wmv. . . You Do not ask me, ask the author to Kazakhstan! Uploaded to the site, namely the quality of the video, web interface, community exchange, and special functions in areas such as comparison. Well, to below Let's look at them one by one and the test results (in alphabetical order played a final summary).
1.? Eyespot?? Http://eyespot.com/
Gravity: 3. Easy-to-use upload function and hash function.
Interface: 4. Bright colors. Support labelling, forums, and breakout. Small community functions.
Edit: 4. From the craniocaudal tailoring, the use of recording short time line, add photos and music.
Share: 2. Published on the group to invite friends to join (but not directly invited to watch)
Summary: 3.5. Easy-to-use upload function. However, only 25 MB file is not restricted small points (3.5 a-I guess not enough ah)? Editing features also unsatisfactory. In short, give me a reason to, or on the first use of other Eyespot.
2.? Google? Video http://video.google.com/ ??????
Gravity: 5. Google.
Interface: 4. Google simple interface. But upload need Google? Video? Uploader. Video can be added to the large number of Notes, if no one can understand video, it is really is a useful function. Video can be to their own pricing, paying to watch.
Editor: 0. Why is zero? Is not zero.
Share: 2. See below.
Summary: 3. Google? Video needs a "video certification" process. In other words, to the first-instance trial Huasuoren to you absolutely can not let the cancer of crippling people's capitalism we the flowers of the motherland. This first instance Mody, is not a 10-day half End can Kazakhstan.
3.? Grouper ??????? http://grouper.com/
Gravity: 4. A file-sharing function of YouTube.
Interface: 3. If you want to functional, it would have a procedure. Using Windows? Media format, rather than the popular Flash. Support rating, labelling, grouping, such as RSS feeds.
Edit: 4. By downloading procedures, support video, photos and music mixed.
Share: 3. Can be directed to MySpace, Friendster, eBay. Downloaded to a hard drive or iPod.
Summary: 4. Hash function is easy to use, will soon be popular. File-sharing seems to be reactive but also for the completion. If on-line mixed and not download programs, it would Gengshuang.
4.? Jumpcut ????????? http://jumpcut.com/
Gravity: 5. Online create, edit, mixed video.
Interface: 4. Refreshing interface, video size than all the other sites. But can not automatically broadcast video, video downloading nor Tips - When can players? Guess it slowly.
Edit: 5. - Editing features: support lens stitching, short records, photos mixed music, add transition effects, and even special effects processing. The are all from, it can open its own online room of a post-production.
Share: 4. By e-mail to a friend, embedded in the web page, especially with the combination of Wordpress is seamless.
Summary: 5. Jumpcut a split, you can really understand what is powerful. Now no other site can match them. However, there are two sides of the coin (rather than three, four), to obtain the effect of these gorgeous, playback speed will be slow, and image quality will fall.
5.? Ourmedia ??????? http://ourmedia.org/
Gravity: 3. RT: global home video roots.
Interface: 2. A bit slow, a little relief, a bit chaotic. Need to register a variety of services in order to upload video. No video format conversion, had to see if all the best players have the latest version installed again. However, support for the use of Creative? Commons? Licenses for copyright protection.
Editor: 0. No.
Share: 3. RSS subscription to a friend e-mail, each a separate video links.
Summary: 2.5. If you like intact after the upload video, and can have great patience waiting for a one-minute video in one hour, upload, This is a good place. Otherwise, such as alpha on beta program when it again.
6.? Revver ????????? http://revver.com/
Gravity: 5. YouTube can be profitable. If you see someone in shock when the embedded video advertising, you can get 20% of advertising costs. If in the final Revver also click on the link, it can be opened on May 5. Also good?
Interface: 3. Quicktime-based rather than Flash. Need a separate download client to upload video. Support the labels, mail classification and playlists.
Editor: 0. No.
Share: 2. See below.
Summary: 3.5. Google model is to make money than attractive. However, Google and the same time to upload the need for strict review. Trial ah, ah trial is not let you on Kazakhstan.
7.? Videoegg ??????? http://videoegg.com/
Gravity: 4. To make it easier to upload files in any format and publish their own blog or to share with friends.
Interface: 4. Need to download a separate program to upload. However download functions can be closely integrated with the browser, and supports drag-and-drop functions.
Edit: 2. Support simple "Qiatouquwei" feature.
Share: 4. Directly to eBay, Blogger and Typepad. Can be generated to simple URL to a friend, but also can generate javascript code embedded in its own blog.
Summary: 4. The use of the process is quite happy, especially to friends and share video, Videoegg definitely is a good choice. Flash? 8 video screen also very decent. However, in some sites, video can not be properly embedded.
8.? Vimeo None http://vimeo.com/
Gravity: 5. Flickr video sector.
Interface: 4. Beautiful, cool. Use flash to the local video player, not a watermark, and players can adjust the volume. Support labels, comments, vote.
Editor: 0. No.
Share: 5. Post to Flickr, posted to del.icio.us, download source files, embedded in MySpace, RSS feeds and famous.
Summary: 4. Good video quality, and can be seamlessly embedded into other sites. However, community functions Shaoledian. And because learning Flickr too inputs, 20 MB of storage space for the video, too much Shaoledian.
9.? VSocial ??????? http://vsocial.com/
Gravity: 4. So-called: I fastest.
Interface: 3. Homogeneity on the Web? 2.0 interface. Large characters, AJAX, labelling, ratings, comments, and so on. Creative support? Common? Licenses permit copyright protection.
Edit: 2. Not visible in the editing function (because upload unsuccessful Kazakhstan). List can also play video biological rolling demonstration.
Share: 4. Can be embedded into MySpace, Typepad, Blogger, del.icio.us, Flickr, BlogIt!, As well as RSS feeds, etc..
Summary: 3.5. Although many community functions, but it is somewhat misnamed website. I fastest so-called, it is not fast. Image quality will be greatly reduced: 320 X240 will be converted into size.
10.? YouTube None http://youtube.com/
Gravity: 5. If you have not heard of until now had YouTube, then you really Mars.
Interface: 4. Label, rating, collectors, comments. Can create playlists, a friend of video subscribers, subscription label. Can be full-screen video.
Editor: 0. No.
Share: 4. Can be embedded into MySpace, Friendster, Blogger, such as eBay.
Summary: 4.5. Not very shortcomings, very good video quality. But when no progress upload tips, when players sometimes delayed.
?
Aggregate. Below look at the Champion:
Released: Champion-Vimeo? MO few, and support download source files, in addition to a small space almost no point of shortcomings. Videoegg alternate can be done.
View: There is no controversy should be YouTube?, Crowded communities, a large number of video, it is the outstanding quality assurance. VSocial? And? Grouper must continue our efforts.
Edit: Nature is powerful Jumpcut? Has. Now no one can shake its status.
?
Note: Although the election here in the video of the 10 sites for evaluation, but now offering similar services to the online site is more than these. A norm-not the kind of scores of the 40 sites here in fact are worth a try. I may not come back from Mars, it is still to see the country have a decent video sharing site. In fact, "for the boys", the success of more or less proves that in China there is still vast personal video of the mass base, and is the great Jiantu. Money, money, money -! Of course, not just a question of money. For example, a few days ago, the United States passed the police video on MySpace seize two former US Air Force Base still autonomy bomb children (here). Another one of these is written reviewed. Nonsense less Anyway, hope that in the near future we can see their own websites.
Posted on 2006-07-19 10:06 pure water reading (133) Comments (0) edit their collections quoted Category: Web Site Development
